Aktueller Stand

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/emit-interpolated-string.test.js

@@ -1,17 +1,20 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('..')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('emit with interpolated string', t => {
   t.plan(4)
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
+
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   function onWarning (warning) {
-    t.equal(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
-    t.equal(warning.code, 'CODE')
-    t.equal(warning.message, 'Hello world')
-    t.ok(codeWarning.emitted)
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.code, 'CODE')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.message, 'Hello world')
+    t.assert.ok(codeWarning.emitted)
   }
 
   const codeWarning = createWarning({
@@ -24,6 +27,8 @@ test('emit with interpolated string', t => {
 
   setImmediate(() => {
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/emit-once-only.test.js

@@ -1,17 +1,20 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('..')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('emit should emit a given code only once', t => {
   t.plan(4)
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
+
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   function onWarning (warning) {
-    t.equal(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
-    t.equal(warning.code, 'CODE')
-    t.equal(warning.message, 'Hello world')
-    t.ok(warn.emitted)
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.code, 'CODE')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.message, 'Hello world')
+    t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
   }
 
   const warn = createWarning({
@@ -23,6 +26,8 @@ test('emit should emit a given code only once', t => {
   warn()
   setImmediate(() => {
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/emit-reset.test.js

@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('../')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('a limited warning can be re-set', t => {
   t.plan(4)
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
   let count = 0
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   function onWarning () {
@@ -19,18 +21,20 @@ test('a limited warning can be re-set', t => {
   })
 
   warn()
-  t.ok(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
 
   warn()
-  t.ok(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
 
   warn.emitted = false
   warn()
-  t.ok(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
 
   setImmediate(() => {
-    t.equal(count, 2)
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(count, 2)
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/emit-set.test.js

@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('../')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('emit should set the emitted state', t => {
   t.plan(3)
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
+
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   function onWarning () {
     t.fail('should not be called')
@@ -16,15 +19,17 @@ test('emit should set the emitted state', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'Hello world'
   })
-  t.notOk(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(!warn.emitted)
   warn.emitted = true
-  t.ok(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
 
   warn()
-  t.ok(warn.emitted)
+  t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
 
   setImmediate(() => {
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/emit-unlimited.test.js

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('..')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('emit should emit a given code unlimited times', t => {
   t.plan(50)
@@ -10,13 +11,15 @@ test('emit should emit a given code unlimited times', t => {
   const expectedRun = []
   const times = 10
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
+
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   function onWarning (warning) {
-    t.equal(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
-    t.equal(warning.code, 'CODE')
-    t.equal(warning.message, 'Hello world')
-    t.ok(warn.emitted)
-    t.equal(runs++, expectedRun.shift())
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.name, 'TestDeprecation')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.code, 'CODE')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.message, 'Hello world')
+    t.assert.ok(warn.emitted)
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(runs++, expectedRun.shift())
   }
 
   const warn = createWarning({
@@ -32,6 +35,8 @@ test('emit should emit a given code unlimited times', t => {
   }
   setImmediate(() => {
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/index.test.js

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const test = require('tap').test
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning, createDeprecation } = require('..')
 
 process.removeAllListeners('warning')
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ test('Create warning with zero parameter', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'Not available'
   })
-  t.equal(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
-  t.equal(warnItem.message, 'Not available')
-  t.equal(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.message, 'Not available')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
 })
 
 test('Create error with 1 parameter', t => {
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ test('Create error with 1 parameter', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'hey %s'
   })
-  t.equal(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
-  t.equal(warnItem.format('alice'), 'hey alice')
-  t.equal(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.format('alice'), 'hey alice')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
 })
 
 test('Create error with 2 parameters', t => {
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ test('Create error with 2 parameters', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'hey %s, I like your %s'
   })
-  t.equal(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
-  t.equal(warnItem.format('alice', 'attitude'), 'hey alice, I like your attitude')
-  t.equal(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.format('alice', 'attitude'), 'hey alice, I like your attitude')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
 })
 
 test('Create error with 3 parameters', t => {
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ test('Create error with 3 parameters', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'hey %s, I like your %s %s'
   })
-  t.equal(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
-  t.equal(warnItem.format('alice', 'attitude', 'see you'), 'hey alice, I like your attitude see you')
-  t.equal(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.name, 'TestWarning')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.format('alice', 'attitude', 'see you'), 'hey alice, I like your attitude see you')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warnItem.code, 'CODE')
 })
 
 test('Creates a deprecation warning', t => {
@@ -65,24 +65,24 @@ test('Creates a deprecation warning', t => {
     code: 'CODE',
     message: 'hello %s'
   })
-  t.equal(deprecationItem.name, 'DeprecationWarning')
-  t.equal(deprecationItem.format('world'), 'hello world')
-  t.equal(deprecationItem.code, 'CODE')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(deprecationItem.name, 'DeprecationWarning')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(deprecationItem.format('world'), 'hello world')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(deprecationItem.code, 'CODE')
 })
 
 test('Should throw when error code has no name', t => {
   t.plan(1)
-  t.throws(() => createWarning(), new Error('Warning name must not be empty'))
+  t.assert.throws(() => createWarning(), new Error('Warning name must not be empty'))
 })
 
 test('Should throw when error has no code', t => {
   t.plan(1)
-  t.throws(() => createWarning({ name: 'name' }), new Error('Warning code must not be empty'))
+  t.assert.throws(() => createWarning({ name: 'name' }), new Error('Warning code must not be empty'))
 })
 
 test('Should throw when error has no message', t => {
   t.plan(1)
-  t.throws(() => createWarning({
+  t.assert.throws(() => createWarning({
     name: 'name',
     code: 'code'
   }), new Error('Warning message must not be empty'))
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ test('Should throw when error has no message', t => {
 
 test('Cannot set unlimited other than boolean', t => {
   t.plan(1)
-  t.throws(() => createWarning({
+  t.assert.throws(() => createWarning({
     name: 'name',
     code: 'code',
     message: 'message',

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/issue-88.test.js

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const { test } = require('tap')
+const { test } = require('node:test')
 const { createWarning } = require('..')
+const { withResolvers } = require('./promise')
 
 test('Must not overwrite config', t => {
   t.plan(1)
 
   function onWarning (warning) {
-    t.equal(warning.code, 'CODE_1')
+    t.assert.deepStrictEqual(warning.code, 'CODE_1')
   }
 
   const a = createWarning({
@@ -22,12 +23,16 @@ test('Must not overwrite config', t => {
     unlimited: true
   })
 
+  const { promise, resolve } = withResolvers()
+
   process.on('warning', onWarning)
   a('CODE_1')
   a('CODE_1')
 
   setImmediate(() => {
     process.removeListener('warning', onWarning)
-    t.end()
+    resolve()
   })
+
+  return promise
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/jest.test.js

@@ -3,20 +3,22 @@
 
 const { createWarning } = require('..')
 
-test('works with jest', done => {
-  const code = createWarning({
-    name: 'TestDeprecation',
-    code: 'CODE',
-    message: 'Hello world'
-  })
-  code('world')
+if (globalThis.test) {
+  test('works with jest', done => {
+    const code = createWarning({
+      name: 'TestDeprecation',
+      code: 'CODE',
+      message: 'Hello world'
+    })
+    code('world')
 
-  // we cannot actually listen to process warning event
-  // because jest messes with it (that's the point of this test)
-  // we can only test it was emitted indirectly
-  // and test no exception is raised
-  setImmediate(() => {
-    expect(code.emitted).toBeTruthy()
-    done()
+    // we cannot actually listen to process warning event
+    // because jest messes with it (that's the point of this test)
+    // we can only test it was emitted indirectly
+    // and test no exception is raised
+    setImmediate(() => {
+      expect(code.emitted).toBeTruthy()
+      done()
+    })
   })
-})
+}

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/no-warnings.test.js

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 'use strict'
 
-const { test } = require('tap')
-const { spawnSync } = require('child_process')
-const { resolve } = require('path')
+const { test } = require('node:test')
+const { spawnSync } = require('node:child_process')
+const { resolve } = require('node:path')
 
 const entry = resolve(__dirname, '../examples', 'example.js')
 
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ test('--no-warnings is set in cli', t => {
   ])
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.equal(stderr, '')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(stderr, '')
 })
 
 test('--no-warnings is not set in cli', t => {
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ test('--no-warnings is not set in cli', t => {
   ])
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
+  t.assert.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
 })
 
 test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is set to 1', t => {
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is set to 1', t => {
   })
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.equal(stderr, '')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(stderr, '')
 })
 
 test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is set to 0', t => {
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is set to 0', t => {
   })
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
+  t.assert.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
 })
 
 test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is not set', t => {
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ test('NODE_NO_WARNINGS is not set', t => {
   ])
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
+  t.assert.match(stderr, /\[CUSTDEP001\] DeprecationWarning: This is a deprecation warning/)
 })
 
 test('NODE_Options contains --no-warnings', t => {
@@ -76,5 +76,5 @@ test('NODE_Options contains --no-warnings', t => {
   })
 
   const stderr = child.stderr.toString()
-  t.equal(stderr, '')
+  t.assert.deepStrictEqual(stderr, '')
 })

backend/node_modules/process-warning/test/promise.js

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+module.exports = {
+  withResolvers: function () {
+    let promiseResolve, promiseReject
+    const promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+      promiseResolve = resolve
+      promiseReject = reject
+    })
+    return { promise, resolve: promiseResolve, reject: promiseReject }
+  }
+}